Free tool

SaaS magic number calculator

What a euro of sales and marketing spend returns as new recurring revenue, against the accepted benchmark bands, and how long the spend takes to pay back. Nothing stored.

Revenue
Spend
Magic number
1.50
very efficient
New revenue, annualized
300,000
quarterly growth × 4
Payback, on revenue
8 mo
to recover the S&M spend
Payback, on gross profit
10 mo
at 80% gross margin
Magic numberVerdict
Under 0.5Not working, fix the model before spending more
0.5 to 0.75Borderline, look deeper before deciding
0.75 to 1Efficient, keep investing
Over 1Very efficient, likely underspending on growth ← you

Each euro into sales and marketing produced €1.50 of annualized new revenue. On revenue the spend pays back in about 8 months; counted in gross profit, the money that actually pays bills, it is closer to 10 months. That second reading is the one to plan cash around.

The magic number formula

new revenue      = this quarter − last quarter
magic number     = (new revenue × 4) / last quarter's S&M spend
payback (months) = 12 / magic number

The metric asks one question: when this company puts money into sales and marketing, does recurring revenue come back out? A magic number of 1 means a quarter's spend recreates itself as annualized revenue within a year. The benchmark bands come from Lars Leckie, who coined the metric, and the full definition with the worked example lives at SaaS magic number in the glossary.

Two honest caveats. The formula runs on revenue, so a company at 60 percent gross margin recovers its money materially slower than the ratio implies, which is why the calculator shows payback in gross-profit months as well. And it judges only the go-to-market: a company can post a strong magic number while burning heavily everywhere else, which is what the burn multiple catches, and what the Rule of 40 summarizes for the whole company at once.

Common questions

How do you calculate the SaaS magic number?

Take this quarter's recurring revenue minus last quarter's, multiply by four to annualize it, and divide by last quarter's total sales and marketing spend. Magic number = (quarterly revenue growth × 4) / prior quarter S&M spend. Count salaries and tools in the spend, not just advertising.

What is a good SaaS magic number?

The convention set by Lars Leckie, who coined the metric: above 0.75 the go-to-market is efficient enough to keep funding, below 0.5 the model needs fixing before more spend, and between the two you look deeper. Above 1 usually reads as underspending on growth.

Why is the spend from the previous quarter?

Because sales and marketing takes at least a sales cycle to turn into revenue. Crediting this quarter's growth to this quarter's spend would reward whatever was signed before the money was spent. Companies with long enterprise cycles sometimes lag the spend by two quarters instead.

What is the difference between the magic number and the burn multiple?

The magic number judges only sales and marketing spend; the burn multiple judges the whole company, dividing total net burn by net new ARR. A company can have a strong magic number and a bad burn multiple when the rest of the cost base is heavy, which is exactly why investors look at both.

Efficiency ratios are only as good as their inputs

Plainhub keeps revenue and spending current as you record them, so the quarter-end numbers this ratio needs exist the day the quarter ends, not two weeks after.